Review



3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6  (COMSOL Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    COMSOL Inc 3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6
    (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) <t>Multiphysics</t> software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.
    3d Heat Transfer Model Comsol Multiphysics V5.6, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+heat+transfer+model+comsol+multiphysics+v5%2E6/3d+heat+transfer+model+comsol+multiphysics+v5+6/pmc09354021-96-9-8
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Invisible Thermoplasmonic Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Ink for Anti-counterfeiting Applications"

    Article Title: Invisible Thermoplasmonic Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Ink for Anti-counterfeiting Applications

    Journal: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c10864

    (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) Multiphysics software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) Multiphysics software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.

    Techniques Used: Irradiation, Software

    Related Articles

    Irradiation:

    Article Title: Invisible Thermoplasmonic Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Ink for Anti-counterfeiting Applications
    Article Snippet: We implemented a 3D heat transfer model in COMSOL Multiphysics v5.6 in order to investigate the achievable thermal resolution as a function of substrate thickness and exposure time.

    Software:

    Article Title: Invisible Thermoplasmonic Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Ink for Anti-counterfeiting Applications
    Article Snippet: We implemented a 3D heat transfer model in COMSOL Multiphysics v5.6 in order to investigate the achievable thermal resolution as a function of substrate thickness and exposure time.



    Similar Products

    3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc 3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6
    (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) <t>Multiphysics</t> software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.
    3d Heat Transfer Model Comsol Multiphysics V5.6, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+heat+transfer+model+comsol+multiphysics+v5%2E6/3d+heat+transfer+model+comsol+multiphysics+v5+6/pmc09354021-96-9-8
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d heat transfer model comsol multiphysics v5.6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) Multiphysics software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.

    Journal: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    Article Title: Invisible Thermoplasmonic Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Ink for Anti-counterfeiting Applications

    doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c10864

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Thermal images of ITO-10 NP samples printed with different parameters, exposed to IR lamp irradiation (100 W@50 cm), acquired ad different times, as in panel (b); sample 25DS 1 L, 25DS 2 L, 25DS 2 L, and 25DS 2 L refer to various combinations of drop spacing (DS = 25, 50 μm) and number of printed layers (L = 1, 2). (b) Thermal dynamics of the same samples, averaged with an ROI (region of interest) of 0.5 × 0.5cm 2 placed in the center of the printed squares. Irradiation with the IR lamp starts at 0 s and ends at 36 s. (c) Evaluation of thermal pattern resolution considering the two different designs “interline” and “linewidth”, performed on a specific printed sample exposed to the IR lamp (100 W@50 cm): interline on the left has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom); linewidth on the right has widths of 2500, 1000, 500, and 250 μm (from top to bottom). (d) Simulated thermal image of the 25DS 1 L square sample (1 cm side) obtained by finite element modeling (FEM) Multiphysics software. (e) Thermal resolution, evaluated as the gradient of temperature along the x axis at the edge of the ITO square vs substrate thickness and time, obtained by simulation. Timestamp in panels (a), (c), and (d) indicates the time elapsed from IR irradiation starting.

    Article Snippet: We implemented a 3D heat transfer model in COMSOL Multiphysics v5.6 in order to investigate the achievable thermal resolution as a function of substrate thickness and exposure time.

    Techniques: Irradiation, Software